Mode 3 — Sovereign PKI

Sovereign PKI is institutional certificate infrastructure where no single party can be trusted. Confium’s Mode 3 gives institutions sovereignty over four dimensions that conventional PKI locks down:

  1. Certificate formats — define your own certificate structure, extensions, and encoding. CMS, X.509, custom ASN.1, or JSON.
  2. Delegation rules — express scoped delegation (“this issuer can issue measuring-instrument certificates, but only for category C, and only until 2027-04-01”).
  3. Archival cadence — define how often tree heads are anchored in external media (Bitcoin via OTS, RFC 4998 ERS archival).
  4. Quorum composition — express attribute-based threshold policies: “5-of-9 directors from 3 distinct regions”.

When to choose Mode 3

  • You’re an institution that issues certificates and no single stakeholder can hold the signing key alone.
  • Conventional CA software doesn’t model your delegation, jurisdiction, or quorum rules.
  • You need a public, verifiable record of every certificate ever issued (transparency log).
  • You operate across jurisdictions with different algorithm requirements.

Reference deployments

Sovereign PKI is the right shape for:

  • Calibration registries — BIPM-style metrology chains where measurements must be traceable to a sovereign reference.
  • Pharma regulator approvals — multi-jurisdiction sign-off on clinical trial data and drug approvals.
  • Academic accreditation — cross-institutional degree and credential verification without a single trusted authority.
  • Supply-chain provenance — manufacturing step attestation anchored in a public transparency log.
  • Treaty organizations — multi-state cooperative instruments requiring concurrent sovereign approval.
  • CNML — certified measuring instruments list, a reference Mode 3 deployment.

Architecture

A Mode 3 deployment typically includes:

  • Custom certificate profile — declared via the confium-cert crate’s profile mechanism.
  • Delegation templatesconfium-cert-delegation for scoped delegation chains.
  • Attribute-based threshold predicatesconfium-attributes for quorum policies (“T-of-N from K distinct groups”).
  • Transparency logconfium-transparency (RFC 6962 Merkle tree) anchoring every certificate issuance.
  • OpenTimestamps anchoringconfium-ots for Bitcoin-anchored tree heads (defense in depth).
  • Archivalconfium-ers (RFC 4998 Evidence Record Syntax) for long-term evidence retention.
  • Coordinatorconfium-tc-coordinator orchestrating signing sessions across the institutional signers.

Defense in depth

Mode 3 deployments should layer:

  1. Consistency proofs (RFC 6962 §2.1.2) — every new tree head extends the previous one.
  2. Witness gossip — coordinators share tree heads periodically so split-view attacks are detectable.
  3. OTS anchoring — tree heads are timestamped in Bitcoin for an irrefutable “what head existed at time T” record.

See the transparency logs security analysis for details.

See also